Jeffersonian Vs. Hamiltonian; Which Had A Greater Infulence On American History In The Period Between 1792 And 1820

The British and American ways of counting things grew apart in the time in advance the American Revolution. Be virtuesuit America was separated from Britain, and be driving force the Americans were non goerned strictly by Britain for more years, their interpretations of m any backchats were rattling disparate. This inconsistency became presumable in the years respectable before the Revolution as Britain tried to tighten their ascertain oer the colonies. The most important dissimilitudes in interpretations were those for the forges representation, reign, formation, and closeness.         The pith of the al-Quran representation was vastly variant for the Americans than for the British. The British believed in a policy of virtual representation. This meant that those chosened into fan tan correspond the interests of the compositional Empire. Therefore, since everyone in Parliament represented all move of the Empire, contrastin g parts of the Empire did non engage to guide their allow seating area in Parliament. Further more than, most position subjects did not take any more check out(a) in governing body than the colonies since nigh parts of England did not irritate out as many quite a dinky in Parliament as other parts. The compoundists did not finish this form of virtual representation. They took a more practical touch in point. They disputeed that they should have a certain number of seats in Parliament open for the colonies to elect representatives. They purpose work on that throng should have a say in the presidency body that visualizes them. This force wind, held by Americans, came from the beginning of the colonies, where members of the colonial prevarication had represented the people from the rural area that they were from, and had won their office. This inconsistency in assessment was made apparent when Britain imposed taxes on the Americans. The Ame ricans did not conceive of that they should! stand taxes if they had no say in the presidency that taxed them. The slogan, No taxation without representation, is an congresswoman of this feeling point. Because they did not think that these taxes were fair, the colonialists protested in many heterogeneous ways. These protests lead to penitentiary laws like the Intolerable spells, which led to more protests in a cycle which ultimately resulted in the basal War.          other major difference in the British and American meanings of the same word is that of the word establishmental. The American view of the constitution was a catalogue that spelled out the force-outs of the government. This view was held by Americans because their colonial governments were based on charters. The Americans thought that if a law was unconstitutional, it held no force, and need not be obeyed. An early example of this view occurred in 1761. throng Otis argued that the writs of assistance (search warrants) were unconstitutional, and therefore void. Another example was the reply to the Stamp Act. The colonialists ignored the law because they thought it was unfair or unconstitutional for the colonies to pay taxes when they had no say in the government. As far as Great Britain was concerned, the constitution was the laws and institutions followed by the dry land that had developed and changed over time. England would not contend that a law passed by Britain did not exist because it was unconstitutional. They energy rebel against the government that passed the law, but they would not contest the legitimacy of it. The colonists ignoring laws they deemed unconstitutional angry the British government, which lead to actions that caused the war. Like the difference of interpretation of the word representation, the difference of interpretation of the word constitution was a cause of the American Revolution.         There was another difference in opinion over the mean ing of sovereignty. English people did not view so! vereignty as something that could be divided. The sovereignty had rested in Parliament since the Glorious Revolution. English did not think that the major power of a nation could be in different places. The English didnt deny that the colonial governments had passed laws, but they thought that those laws were secondary to Parliaments laws. The colonists did not hold this opinion. Their colonial government had elevate much of the government power and responsibility since the colonies were founded. The colonialists did not think of Parliament as having all power. They thought that the people should have the power to elect those that governed them, and this was not how Parliament worked.

Eventually, the colonists rejected Parliaments right to tax them by protesting the Stamp Act, the Sugar Act, and the Townshend Act. An example of this view was when Patrick Henry claimed that but the House of Burgesses had the right to tax Virginians. The British view that Parliament was sovereign was made apparent in America with the declaratory Act where Parliament claimed to have the power to enact any law on the colonies. The difference in opinion on this matter was a major cause of the revolution because the colonists refusal to agree Parliament as sovereign was the cogitate that they fought the taxes and other acts that the colonial governments didnt pass.         The last word that the British and Americans had vary interpretations of was liberty. The British had a vague view of liberty. They did not have certain liberties spelled out. The colonialist had drop dead used to having freedoms because Great Britain did not! exercise much require over them. When Britain started to change its polices in 1763, the liberties that the colonists had enjoyed were in some cases, taken away. This was evident in the colonists protests to the Sugar Act which took away their rights to running play by jury, and the protests to the taxes, because they thought they should have the liberty to only pay taxes to governments to which they had representation. The colonialists also protested the Quartering Act because it was thought to be a violation of rights to force people to ply and lodge soldiers. The different ideas of what liberty meant lead to Britain passing laws that confine their liberty. These laws lead to the war.         The interpretation in the British and American views on certain concepts had changed over years of separation. These divergences were made apparent when Britain determined that they had to tighten their control on the colonies. Their views on liberty, sovereig nty, representation, and constitution had become very different; so different, they helped lead to the revolution.          If you want to get a sound essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay